Rankings / ETV

ETV

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities

SPYIssuer: Eaton VanceInception: September 30, 2005

6.0

Overall Score

Strategy & Profile

ETV is a closed-end fund that holds two stock segments: one seeks to beat the S&P 500, the other the Nasdaq-100. It sells index call options continuously on at least 80% of each segment, with S&P 500 calls on the first and Nasdaq-100 calls on the second. The fund is tax-managed, uses no leverage, and pays monthly. Its shares trade at a discount to NAV of about 9%.

TTM Yield: 7.99% — trailing 12-month distributions, as of September 30, 2026
Expense ratio
0.89%
Inception
Sep 2005
AUM
$1.9B
Beta
0.885
Volatility (ann.)
16.21%
Upside capture
77.68%
Downside capture
94.60%

Characteristics

  • ✓2024 return +27.7% vs +24.9% for SPY, the only year it beat SPY
  • ✓Trades at a 9.4% discount to NAV (1-year average 7.2%)
  • ✓Distribution rate 7.20% on NAV and 7.95% on market price

Considerations

  • ✗Down capture of 95% against 78% up capture
  • ✗Expense ratio 1.08%, the highest of the 28 funds
  • ✗Total return +96.8% vs +216.8% for SPY since Feb 2019

Fits

  • →Buys closed-end funds for the discount
  • →Holds in a taxable account and values tax management
  • →Accepts equity-level volatility

Doesn't fit

  • →Wants downside protection
  • →Cannot tolerate a discount that widens
  • →Wants low fees

How it works

The fund holds a diversified portfolio of US common stocks and writes call options on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 indices. Premium collected from option sales is distributed monthly under a managed distribution plan. The strategy does not hedge market declines: down-capture has exceeded up-capture since inception. As a CEF, shares may trade at a discount or premium to NAV.

In summary

The call overlay costs upside (78% captured) without cushioning losses (95% down capture), and a 1.08% expense ratio adds to the drag.

Performance

Cumulative total return of ETV against SPY, distributions reinvested.

Last 60 months · Sep 2021 – Sep 2026
ETV(+44.4%)
SPY(+90.0%)
-20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%202120222023202420252026

Cumulative total return, rebased to 0% at the start of each period. Distributions reinvested. Data through end of previous month.

Annual returns

Calendar-year total return, distributions reinvested.

YearETVSPY
2026 YTD+10.41%+12.71%
2025+8.61%+17.72%
2024+27.66%+24.89%
2023+9.96%+26.19%
2022-19.69%-18.17%
2021+18.41%+28.75%
2020+13.17%+18.37%
2019+8.63%n/a

Historical years are frozen. YTD is refreshed monthly.

Score breakdown

Composite score from six weighted criteria, measured since inception.

Weight 25%5.1

Total Return

Performance since inception against the benchmark.

Weight 25%3.7

Downside Protection

How much of the benchmark drawdown the fund absorbed.

Weight 25%7.8

Upside Participation

How much of the benchmark rally the fund kept.

Weight 15%9.9

Distribution Consistency

Frequency of distribution cuts below 85% of the previous payment.

Weight 5%1.4

Expense Ratio

Inversely proportional to the annual management fee.

Weight 5%5.0

Liquidity

Assets under management on a log scale.

Composite score by time window

The same six criteria, applied to different trailing periods. Pro subscribers see the full breakdown.

Since inception

6.0

3 years

6.6

1 year

6.1

3 months

6.8

🔒

See the full time-window breakdown

How has ETV ranked across inception, 3 years, 1 year, and 3 months? Pro subscribers can compare a fund's trajectory over every window, across all 28 funds.

Unlock all 4 windows — $34/month

Cancel anytime. Full monthly history included.

Key Metrics

Expense Ratio

0.890%

Inception Date

September 30, 2005

Benchmark

SPY

Category

Covered Call - Large Cap

Distribution Frequency

Monthly

Maturity Rating

5/5 stars

Scores calculated using CoveredRank methodology. Every formula is published and reproducible.

See full methodology→

Disclaimer: CoveredRank provides independent educational content only. This is not financial advice. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.