QDVO and GPIQ are both covered call ETFs tracking the same benchmark, but with different approaches. QDVO offers ~5.8% yield with a focus on growth investors who want some income without fully sacrificing upside participation, while GPIQ provides ~9.8% yield targeting sophisticated investor seeking the best structured nasdaq covered call. Compare their scores, yields, and performance metrics to find the best fit for your portfolio.
Compare covered call ETFs with the same benchmark side by side
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
7.68
Overall Score
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
7.57
Overall Score
| Criteria | QDVO | GPIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 7.68 7.57 | |
| Total Return (25%) | 8.58 8.57 | |
| Downside Protection (25%) | 6.08 4.55 | |
| Upside Participation (25%) | 8.01 8.51 | |
| Consistency (15%) | 9.60 9.70 | |
| Expense Ratio (5%) | 5.62 8.88 | |
| Liquidity (5%) | 5.89 5.27 |
Since Inception
3 Years
Pro only
1 Year
Pro only
3 Months
Pro only
| Metric | QDVO | GPIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.550% | 0.290% |
| Inception Date | Jan 1, 2022 | Oct 24, 2023 |
| Issuer | Amplify | Goldman Sachs |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Maturity Rating | 3/5 stars | 2/5 stars |
The aggressive sibling of DIVO. Higher risk, higher upside potential. Not for conservative income investors.
Investor Profile:
Growth investors who want some income without fully sacrificing upside participation
Structurally superior to JEPQ — Goldman built this product well
Investor Profile:
Sophisticated investor seeking the best structured Nasdaq covered call
Both funds are scored on total return, downside protection, upside participation, distribution consistency, cost and liquidity, against the same benchmark and the same window.
28 covered call ETFs, rescored every month on total return, downside protection and NAV stability. One email a month, no promotions.
We store your email to send the monthly ranking. Unsubscribe any time by replying to any email. We never share or sell it.