IWMI vs RYLD: Which Covered Call ETF Is Better?

IWMI and RYLD are both covered call ETFs tracking the same benchmark, but with different approaches. IWMI offers a 14.82% yield, while RYLD provides a 12.10% yield. Compare their scores, yields, and performance metrics to find the best fit for your portfolio.

Compare ETFs

Compare covered call ETFs with the same benchmark side by side

Step 1: Select Benchmark

Step 2: Select ETFs to Compare

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

RussellInception: Sep 14, 2023

7.40

Overall Score

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

RussellInception: Apr 17, 2019

6.73

Overall Score

CriteriaIWMIRYLD
Overall Score
7.40
6.73
Total Return (25%)
8.86
4.96
Downside Protection (25%)
4.82
8.43
Upside Participation (25%)
8.13
5.71
Consistency (15%)
10.00
9.32
Expense Ratio (5%)
4.00
5.00
Liquidity (5%)
4.90
6.18
🔒

Compare Across All Time Windows

Since Inception

3 Years

Pro only

1 Year

Pro only

3 Months

Pro only

Upgrade to Pro — $34/month

Key Metrics

MetricIWMIRYLD
Expense Ratio0.680%0.600%
Inception DateSep 14, 2023Apr 17, 2019
IssuerNEOSGlobal X
Distribution FrequencyMonthlyMonthly
Maturity Rating2/5 stars4/5 stars

Verdicts

IWMI

Captured 81% of Russell 2000 upside with 25% lower volatility (13.9% vs 18.4%) and a 14.8% yield, over only 27 months.

Investor Profile:

IWMI holds the Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) for about 99% of assets and layers Russell 2000 index options on top, both sold and purchased. The options qualify as Section 1256 contracts, taxed at the 60/40 rate. NEOS manages it actively and distributions have been classified as return of capital. It pays monthly.

RYLD

Paid 12.1% with volatility of 11.0%, but its worst drawdown (-31.1%) matched IWM's (-30.6%) and total return is half of IWM's.

Investor Profile:

RYLD tracks the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It holds the Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) for essentially all of its assets and sells at-the-money call options on the Russell 2000 each month. The rules are mechanical and it pays monthly.

Full scores for these funds

See where these rank against every IWM fund

Both funds are scored on total return, downside protection, upside participation, distribution consistency, cost and liquidity, against the same benchmark and the same window.

Get the monthly ranking by email

28 covered call ETFs, rescored every month on total return, downside protection and NAV stability. One email a month, no promotions.

We store your email to send the monthly ranking. Unsubscribe any time by replying to any email. We never share or sell it.