QYLG and KLIP are both covered call ETFs tracking the same benchmark, but with different approaches. QYLG offers ~6% yield with a focus on tech-oriented investor wanting nasdaq exposure with partial income overlay, while KLIP provides ~25%+ yield targeting speculative investor seeking exposure to chinese tech with income. Compare their scores, yields, and performance metrics to find the best fit for your portfolio.
Compare covered call ETFs with the same benchmark side by side
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
6.2
Overall Score
KraneShares China Internet & Covered Call ETF
4.9
Overall Score
| Criteria | QYLG | KLIP |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 6.2 4.9 | |
| Total Return (25%) | 7.2 1.8 | |
| Downside Protection (25%) | 4.2 9.9 | |
| Upside Participation (25%) | 7.9 3.4 | |
| Consistency (15%) | 5.2 5.4 | |
| Expense Ratio (5%) | 5.0 0.6 | |
| Liquidity (5%) | 5.9 5.1 |
Since Inception
3 Years
Pro only
1 Year
Pro only
3 Months
Pro only
| Metric | QYLG | KLIP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.600% | 0.950% |
| Inception Date | Sep 24, 2020 | Jan 11, 2023 |
| Issuer | Global X | KraneShares |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Maturity Rating | 4/5 stars | 2/5 stars |
Same logic as XYLG but on Nasdaq — better suited for growth-focused investors than income-focused ones
Investor Profile:
Tech-oriented investor wanting Nasdaq exposure with partial income overlay
High yield masks extreme risk — China regulatory and geopolitical risk makes this unsuitable as a core holding
Investor Profile:
Speculative investor seeking exposure to Chinese tech with income
Both funds are scored on total return, downside protection, upside participation, distribution consistency, cost and liquidity, against the same benchmark and the same window.
28 covered call ETFs, rescored every month on total return, downside protection and NAV stability. One email a month, no promotions.
We store your email to send the monthly ranking. Unsubscribe any time by replying to any email. We never share or sell it.