KLIP and QQQI are both covered call ETFs tracking the same benchmark, but with different approaches. KLIP offers ~25%+ yield with a focus on speculative investor seeking exposure to chinese tech with income, while QQQI provides ~14% yield targeting investor seeking nasdaq exposure with high income and optimized tax treatment. Compare their scores, yields, and performance metrics to find the best fit for your portfolio.
Compare covered call ETFs with the same benchmark side by side
KraneShares China Internet & Covered Call ETF
4.9
Overall Score
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
6.6
Overall Score
| Criteria | KLIP | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 4.9 6.6 | |
| Total Return (25%) | 1.8 7.9 | |
| Downside Protection (25%) | 9.9 5.7 | |
| Upside Participation (25%) | 3.4 7.8 | |
| Consistency (15%) | 5.4 4.8 | |
| Expense Ratio (5%) | 0.6 4.0 | |
| Liquidity (5%) | 5.1 6.5 |
Since Inception
3 Years
Pro only
1 Year
Pro only
3 Months
Pro only
| Metric | KLIP | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.950% | 0.680% |
| Inception Date | Jan 11, 2023 | Jan 30, 2024 |
| Issuer | KraneShares | NEOS |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Maturity Rating | 2/5 stars | 2/5 stars |
High yield masks extreme risk — China regulatory and geopolitical risk makes this unsuitable as a core holding
Investor Profile:
Speculative investor seeking exposure to Chinese tech with income
Ranked #1 in our model but interpret with caution — only 2 maturity stars, no 2022-style correction in its history
Investor Profile:
Investor seeking Nasdaq exposure with high income and optimized tax treatment
Both funds are scored on total return, downside protection, upside participation, distribution consistency, cost and liquidity, against the same benchmark and the same window.
28 covered call ETFs, rescored every month on total return, downside protection and NAV stability. One email a month, no promotions.
We store your email to send the monthly ranking. Unsubscribe any time by replying to any email. We never share or sell it.