GPIX and PBP are both covered call ETFs tracking the same benchmark, but with different approaches. GPIX offers ~8.6% yield with a focus on investor seeking s&p 500 covered call with minimum costs, while PBP provides ~7% yield targeting conservative investor valuing historical track record above all. Compare their scores, yields, and performance metrics to find the best fit for your portfolio.
Compare covered call ETFs with the same benchmark side by side
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
6.5
Overall Score
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
5.3
Overall Score
| Criteria | GPIX | PBP |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 6.5 5.3 | |
| Total Return (25%) | 8.6 2.4 | |
| Downside Protection (25%) | 3.3 8.2 | |
| Upside Participation (25%) | 8.7 5.3 | |
| Consistency (15%) | 4.4 5.1 | |
| Expense Ratio (5%) | 8.9 6.4 | |
| Liquidity (5%) | 5.5 5.4 |
Since Inception
3 Years
Pro only
1 Year
Pro only
3 Months
Pro only
| Metric | GPIX | PBP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.290% | 0.490% |
| Inception Date | Mar 1, 2023 | Dec 20, 2007 |
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Invesco |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Maturity Rating | 2/5 stars | 5/5 stars |
Direct competitor to SPYI — GPIX wins on fees, SPYI wins on yield
Investor Profile:
Investor seeking S&P 500 covered call with minimum costs
The grandfather of covered call ETFs — its 2008 data is invaluable for stress testing
Investor Profile:
Conservative investor valuing historical track record above all
Both funds are scored on total return, downside protection, upside participation, distribution consistency, cost and liquidity, against the same benchmark and the same window.
28 covered call ETFs, rescored every month on total return, downside protection and NAV stability. One email a month, no promotions.
We store your email to send the monthly ranking. Unsubscribe any time by replying to any email. We never share or sell it.